Tuesday, May 3, 2011

The Real Victory Is The NDP's

I know lots of people are depressed this morning thinking about four years of majority rule under the heel of the Nasty Party. It's true that they are a ghoulish and evil lot and they will try to shaft workers, the poor, women, Quebecoises, Aboriginal peoples, the disabled, peace-lovers, the environment and all things good and right in the world that I may have missed. They are, in short, scum.
Just so that you know where I stand.
But while the wingnuts who make up the Tory base may be gloating a bit this morning, my guess is that Harper - a sharper sort of scumbag - is rather more circumspect. Sure, he got his majority but only by poaching a section of right wing Liberals who were peeing their pants at the thought of an NDP federal government and only by promising them stable, moderate rule. Now, of course, Harper is an inveterate liar and charlatan and not prone to keeping his word or respecting democracy or its institutions. But he also doesn't want the Tories to be the next Liberal wipe-out in waiting. If he pushes too hard he has to know that he may win some short term gains but the result will be that the already fragile Liberal Party will complete its collapse as the remaining bulk of its members head to the NDP and a smaller number head to the Tories. If he unites the left under the umbrella of the NDP he will have polarized the country, shifted close to a majority of the electorate to the left and made it much less likely that the Tories will be able to ever win a majority again. All it would take is a breakthrough in the Prairies to put the nail in the coffin of future Tory majorities. So, he will have to govern carefully - I don't expect to see any great lurch to the right in the coming months, just more of his attempt to slowly transform Canada into a right wing dystopia of Seuss-like proportions.
Now, a lot depends on the ability of the NDP to really capitalize on their massive electoral breakthrough. And, in an ironic way, a Harper majority will potentially make that easier and allow the NDP time to consolidate its gains in Quebec, build a party machine to deepen its Quebec roots and pave the way for further gains. If that building process is accompanied by strong opposition in parliament and - even more importantly in my mind - with campaigning on the ground to involve the hundreds of thousands of people who have turned to the NDP, it could really transform Canadian politics. I'd be interested to know, for instance, what sort of relationship exists between the activists and leadership of Quebec Solidaire and the federal NDP. QS is a left-sovereigntist party in Quebec with one seat in Quebec's National Assembly and a presence to some degree across the province, plus several years' experience in holding together riding associations, etc. They are certainly to the left of the NDP and have an official position of being a party of both the ballot box and of the streets. One hopes that sensibility is widely held in the Quebec wing of the NDP because if two-thirds of the NDP caucus seek to build the party through a strategy of mobilizing and that infects the party in English Canada, things could get very exciting. In fact, in the short term my guess is that the NDP is about to become the country's fastest growing political party and it will be infused with idealistic youth and formerly cynical trade unionists. If the flux and the growth combine in the right recipe - something nobody can know at this point but about which we ought to be optimistic - we could be looking at a mass, renewed left wing movement and party.
There are dangers, of course - the union leadership are slow-moving, conservative bureaucrats with little interest in mass mobilizing or anything that disturbs "business as usual." The NDP leadership - many of them union bureaucrats themselves - is likewise conservative in this sense. Layton is a wildcard. He's no radical but he supports extra-parliamentary movements - he has spoken at innumerable anti-war events and Olivia Chow has gone the distance with the War Resisters Support Campaign both inside and outside of parliament. He might encourage this process, which would help it immensely, or he might try to follow a more Harper-esque model of containing the party's rookies by tightly controlling the flow of information and the model of party building. Hopefully the political situation in Quebec is dynamic and massive enough that it will push things forward regardless of what the party leadership thinks.
Harper will have nowhere near that dynamism from his victory and he no longer has the cover of a minority government to blame for his failings. The continuing experience of austerity and recession for the majority of Canadians will undermine Harper's credibility. Having a big, left wing alternative will facilitate that decline. That's why I'm not depressed.

11 comments :

thwap said...

Redbedhead,

Do you have an email address that I can contact you at?

I was looking at your occupation from your profile and wanted to talk about that sort of thing ...

Anonymous said...

I hope you're right. I'm glad to read anything optimistic after last night.

Redbedhead said...

thwap - sent you an e-mail.

liliannattel - don't worry. I should have mentioned that I'm infallible - just listen to me and everything will be better. Boo-ha-ha-ha-ha. :)

Anonymous said...

pq victory in 2012, plus a few more seats for QS.

followed by referendum.

the ndp is too liberal already.

the opposition will have to come from the streets.

the ndp has a long record of blocking social movements against right wing governments.

but hopefully you're right.

i'm less optimistic.

there will be blood and major obstacles to resistance.

Greggles said...

Thanks for the silver lining, and you're correct stating that there is HUGE opportunity for mobilization.

I think you're wrong about the pace Harper is going to take, though.
He's going to move FAST to push through his agenda create a new 'normal' for the next election, which is 4-5 years away. Keep in mind he has an iron grip on the media, his caucus and (now) every parliamentary committee.

He is a deeply frustrated idealogue that has now been unleashed.

It's going to be an interesting fight, that's for sure.

Redbedhead said...

Harper will move fast on some stuff - like his law and order bills unfortunately. But, as for the other stuff - his iron grip on the media didn't stop the NDP from the biggest breakthrough in its history. And he has prevented the parliamentary committees from functioning (with the Tory's handy manual on how to disrupt committee work) for the past five years in any case. I honestly believe that Harper - if he's smart - will be more Machiavellian and will be very cognizant of not destroying the Liberals by pushing too far. He knows that if they do that - and the NDP consolidates its big gains - the Tories will be reduced to a western rump.

Redbedhead said...

Anonymous - I wouldn't personally bet anything on the likely results of the 2012 Quebec election or its aftermath. If the NDP is able to channel the desire for change in Quebec into a pan-Canadian movement that unites, for instance, the French and English union movements, all bets are off on the likelihood of a referendum. The PQ will know that the stakes are high if it loses a third referendum.
And, yeah, the NDP has a mixed history - though not as exclusively negative as you suggest... just mostly. But Jack doesn't have a disciplined experienced caucus. And he doesn't have a disciplined Quebec party machine to keep a lid on the aspirations represented by the 60 MPs from Quebec. Part of building the Quebec party will be about taming the insurgency that has taken place for sure. But for the coming period things are going to be very volatile and there will be lots of potential for that momentum to translate into some further gains and significant struggles. imho

Anonymous said...

hopefully you're right.

the key trick will be to build an independent infrastructure for fighting back through strikes and protests.

the ndp is quite distant (organizationally, politically and personally) from the social movements, so this will be a challenge.

the movements need to come together, build networks and strategies, and prepare to fight back and push the NDP to stay honest and representative of the broad left.

for this reason, i think it is too optimistic to say that the ndp won or anything like that.

christian h. said...

I read somewhere that many of the Quebec candidates of the NDP were stand-ins who often don't even speak French, as the NDP didn't expect this swing in Quebec - any truth to that? (Anyway, we'd love to have a party like the NDP down here in the US... heck, we'd love to have the Liberals, even.)

Redbedhead said...

Hey christian - welcome to my humble abode. :)
Every party in Canada (and probably elsewhere) uses what are called pylon candidates - basically they just run a name in a riding that they have no hope of winning in the foreseeable future in order to have candidates in every riding. In my riding the the NDP and Liberals get 80% between then and the Tories barely break 10%, tying with the Greens. The Tory candidate is never around. I don't even know if she turns up for all-candidates meetings. So, the attempt to suggest that this means the NDP isn't serious is just left-baiting. However, it is true that the NDP had almost nothing in Quebec before yesterday. They literally polled single digits until recently and only had one MP out of 75 or so in the whole province. They now have 60 - a completely unforeseeable expansion. They have no party apparatus in many places where they now have MPs - it will be a real challenge for them to build the party architecture at the same time as forging a coherent caucus in Parliament.

johnbell said...

Hey RBH _ just think what even a dozen new NDP Amir Khadirs could stir up right across this country. You are right on.

DreamHost Promotional Codes