
guest post by Kathryn Palmateer
Oh, how cute. What quirky style. Gosh, doesn’t little pregnant Juno look adorable? She makes pregnancy really work for youth doesn’t she? She’s intelligent and witty and doesn’t even bat an eye when informing her parents that she is pregnant and then later giving her child up for adoption. And then that adorable scene at the end, with that sweet little love song. She’s found innocence and youthfulness again.
Please.
Sure, sure, I understand. Its pro-choice. Pro-the other-choice. You know, women have the right to choose to do whatever they want with their bodies? They, like Juno, can choose to have a child and put it up for adoption or….choose to abort that little fetus with fingernails, as the sweet caring little Asian girl outside the abortion clinic would have it. “All babies want to be borned” she said. She is not your usual abortion protester. She cares about you and your unborn child.
Let’s start with a few things.
To be sure, we cannot understand the impact of a film such as this outside of the context of abortion politics in the United States. The current climate is one of anti-choice bigotry, even 35 years after the Roe v Wade decision, the 1973 decision in which the US Supreme Court determined that governments lacked the power to prohibit abortions. Over the past few years there have been repeated attempts to turn back women’s reproductive freedoms.
By March 2005, legislators in 9 states were crafting bills which would criminalize abortion. In South Dakota, a law was signed in 2006 to ban abortion, making it a crime for doctors to perform abortions with no exception in cases of rape or incest. The ban failed in a 2007 referendum. Also in 2006, the Mississippi House Public Health Committee voted to approve a ban on abortion, but the bill died after the House and Senate failed to agree on compromise legislation.
Several other states have enacted “trigger laws” such as Louisiana which would take effect
if Roe v. Wade is overturned, all of these have been aimed to ignite the battle over Roe v. Wade. President Bush has appointed over 60 judges to the Supreme Court and the federal courts of appeal that are hostile to Roe v. Wade. And yet, polls show that over 60% of likely voters want the 1973 decision upheld. Not surprisingly, Bush is pretty out of touch with the priorities of voters.
Not only are there widespread attacks on abortion laws, in many states, women have slim pickings when it comes to clinics. In the entire state of South Dakota, there is but one abortion clinic. The same is true for Mississippi. Many women are forced to cross state lines to have the procedure.
The messages in movies that we see every day are important influences on the way that we see the world. They aren’t simply stories that entertain us and then go on their merry way. They influence how we think, how we feel and perhaps more importantly, they give fuel to those whose ideas at times dominate the media and politics. Rick Santorum, Republican senator from Pennsylvania, writes about Juno, Knocked Up, and Waitress (along with two other films about unplanned pregnancies) in the Philadelphia Inquirer stating that “our culture….is finally waking up to the reality of life in the womb”. This is the same Rick Santorum who compared homosexuality to incest.
When a movie like Juno poses teenage pregnancy as cute and quirky, it has an immediate and direct impact on popular culture. Not only do young people see this as an option, but they see it as a “cool” option. Teens the age of Juno are not just passively taking in a story like this, just as adults aren’t either.
A film like Juno “mainstreamizes” anti-abortion politics. Because while Juno is the one making the choice (and not the state) it is anti-abortion at its core. Why does such a smart young woman fall for the ploy that a fetus is a person from conception? To Juno, the wretchedness of the abortion clinic demonizes the abortion choice leaving her with not much choice at all.
To my mind, when the truth about abortion is concealed and teen pregnancy and adoption romanticized as is done in the film, it is anti-choice.
What we need to be teaching young people is about safe-sex options. From there, we need to be teaching the truth about abortion and reproductive rights. So you can go ahead and tell me that this movie is pro-choice. But I don’t buy it. It may not be a direct condemnation of abortion. It is not easy and “connect-the-dots” programming targeting pro-life Christians. But in its ability to connect with mainstream audiences, it is definitely a step forward for the anti-abortion movement.
The right to abortion that women have gained through struggle is in a precarious position at best. And no aren’t-we-so-fuckin-clever movie is going to change that.


13 comments:
How isn't incest different from homosexuality? Its just sex, and everyone puts labels on it to demonize it. And im fine with abortion, I just think its being abused by women who use it instead of condoms and common sense. A cheesy movie is not gonna change Roe vs Wade.
Is it safe to assume you support the death penalty for incest and rape? Or is the only one to be sentenced to death the child?
Um, hey buddy it's not a child, it's a fetus. If you can't tell the difference you should probably not even comment.
Secondly, no I don't support the death penalty because the law is applied unevenly, unfairly and inaccurately. Luckily, more and more states are coming to the same conclusion, with moratoriums happening all over the place.
Mike - stats please, for your ridiculous and unfounded belief.
As for incest and homosexuality being the same thing - that's just dumb. Incest takes place in a context - generally it's a relation of power between a father and daughter and that's called sexual abuse.
Thats generalizing it. Much incest is between siblings. and just like regular sex, it can be consensual or not. Thats why I hold it grouped with homosexuality, heterosexuality, what ever. Sexual abuse take place through all these forms and its unfair of you to pin it too only incest.
Dude, whatever. Fine. If people want to have consensual sex, I don't really care who they are. But it's frankly weird in the context of this article to obsess about mislabeling or overly generalizing on this point.
The topic is about how Hollywood is contributing to making anti-abortion politics acceptable and even cool. The suffering of women as a result of restricted - or criminalized - abortion services is far, far greater than that of sibling who want to shag or get married.
Anyone who claims that women use abortion as birth control is a fucking idiot.
-Birth control costs $30 a month, and sometimes it can be free or extremely cheap through services such as Planned Parenthood. There are many sources for condoms. Even NYC has its own brand of free condoms. Meanwhile, an abortion costs $500. Do you think women love going through this?
-An abortion is an intensive surgical procedure with awful risks for the mother. It requires taking time off from work to not only go to the hospital, but to also stay home while your body expels massive amounts of blood and uterine matter. Do you think women love going through this?
-Lastly, what kind of sick fuck are you if you think that women can have abortions without any emotional repercussions? It's the most horrific decision a woman can make, and it tears you apart inside. It sets you into a horrible tail-spin of depression and self-loathing. Do you think women love going through this?
Women do not use abortion instead of birth control. That's a myth. Abortion is the very last resort, and the last thing any woman wants to happen. Shut the fuck up, and get a heart.
The topic is about how Hollywood is contributing to making anti-abortion politics acceptable and even cool.
That's a little bit over the top, don't you think? Where was your outrage when For Keeps or The Snapper were released?
If you have that much concern over reproductive rights, maybe you should consider helping stop ludicrously backwards legislation like the Personhood amendment.
Sorry, bub. Juno was a good movie. To suggest it sets back the Roe v. Wade movement is like saying Sounder endorses stealing. You're just playing bogeyman.
Um, I don't know either "For Keeps" or "The Snapper" - so I can't comment on them (for keeps looks like a piece of crap, however) but I do know that neither of them won any Academy Awards, nor got the same level of buzz. And neither of them were made in the same context - Snapper is an Irish film: the debate is different in Ireland. For Keeps is 1988 and I don't have that good a memory to know precisely what was happening. I do know that Roe v Wade wasn't under the same kind of threat.
As for the Personhood Amendment - I'm in Canada, eh. I did however blog about Canada's Conservatives attacking abortion through the Unborn Victims of Crime Act.
Finally, Juno is crap. That's my opinion. And if you don't think that film, or art, effects the public consciousness then why do we bother with it? And why do we still talk about films from 50-100 years ago, like Birth of a Nation, or Citizen Kane or the Grapes of Wrath? A film that represents an "issue" as a key part of its thematic message, that comes at the right moment in a public debate, can play an important role in shaping that debate.
Truth be told, Roe v. Wade has been under attack the moment the Supreme Court announced its decision. That the Conservatives have "softened" the issue with personhood amendments and intact D&E bans just makes it a perennial hot button issue. My opinion is that it's a medical issue and the government, federal or state, should have no say in it. I mean, if we use Rick Santorum logic (who suggested that gay marriage would lead to people marrying goats), what's to stop folks from thinking that cancer is a form of life? Lampoonish, certainly, but there are folks dumb enough to believe anything An Expert will tell them.
You're welcome to your opinion on Juno. I just disagree with it. But I think you're giving too much power to it. It's not on par with Birth of a Nation or Citizen Kane. Million Dollar Baby hasn't changed the debate on euthanasia and it pulled down more Oscars than Juno did.
Thirdly, I thought "choice" was part of the Pro-Choice movement. Juno chose to keep the baby and give it up for adoption.
Thank you! To be completely honest, I really enjoyed watching Juno. But I think that was part of the problem. I got sucked into the sweetness and I found Juno herself unbearably cool. If I was still a teen when I watched that film and I unexpectedly became pregnant, I can guarantee that the film would have had an impact on my decision. Maybe if I went to the abortion clinic where the protesters are actually wild eyed maniacs calling you a whore and a murderer and the girl at the counter isn't making lewd comments about her boyfriend's junk smelling like pie, I would quickly revert to my pre-Juno abortion stance. But some girls, at least in part because of this movie, wont even make it that far to see. As role models go, Juno is as charismatic as they come. Thank you so much for writing this! I am going to print it out and carry it around with me to show people since this is an argument I keep having with, and you just say it better than I do.
Poster said:
"She’s intelligent and witty and doesn’t even bat an eye when informing her parents that she is pregnant and then later giving her child up for adoption."
Uh..."doesn't even bat an eye" ??!?
You must've been rooting around the fridge for a beer while that scene was playing.
Actually, I think we're supposed to extrapolate this to a general wish on your part to convey that Juno's character was cavalier through the whole thing.
You can't have it both ways. Because the director and actors/actresses strove so hard to show a resonant emotional dimension to a teenager's decision to keep and adopt out an unplanned baby, the movie's affect on you is like that of nails on a blackboard. But this inveighs against characterizations of the direction of Juno's character as purely cavalier.
The fact is, the movie was a tightrope walk between Juno's youthful need to treat life as a game under her control vs. the emotional battlefield that attends bringing new life into the world, with the loss of control that entails. I suppose one can armchair-direct the movie better; feel that Juno wasn't engaged enough in certain scenes, or not engaged enough in others. For my part, I think it was handled well; well enough to convey the message that Juno is a better person for her decision; that it was the right decision for her, for reasons that, by movie's end, are palpable.
Anyway, your clear failure to notice her engagement in the scene where she tells her parents about her pregnancy says a lot about your fitness to offer us a good-faith assessment of it's moral/political impact.
A片,A片,成人網站,成人影片,色情,情色網,情色,AV,AV女優,成人影城,成人,色情A片,日本AV,免費成人影片,成人影片,SEX,免費A片,A片下載,免費A片下載,做愛,情色A片,色情影片,H漫,A漫,18成人
a片,色情影片,情色電影,a片,色情,情色網,情色,av,av女優,成人影城,成人,色情a片,日本av,免費成人影片,成人影片,情色a片,sex,免費a片,a片下載,免費a片下載,成人網站,做愛,自拍
情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣用品
視訊聊天室
A片,A片,A片下載,做愛,成人電影,.18成人,日本A片,情色小說,情色電影,成人影城,自拍,情色論壇,成人論壇,情色貼圖,情色,免費A片,成人,成人網站,成人圖片,AV女優,成人光碟,色情,色情影片,免費A片下載,SEX,AV,色情網站,本土自拍,性愛,成人影片,情色文學,成人文章,成人圖片區,成人貼圖
情色,AV女優,UT聊天室,聊天室,A片,視訊聊天室
UT聊天室,視訊聊天室,辣妹視訊,視訊辣妹,情色視訊,視訊,080視訊聊天室,視訊交友90739,美女視訊,視訊美女,免費視訊聊天室,免費視訊聊天,免費視訊,視訊聊天室,視訊聊天,視訊交友網,視訊交友,情人視訊網,成人視訊,哈啦聊天室,UT聊天室,豆豆聊天室,
聊天室,聊天,色情聊天室,色情,尋夢園聊天室,聊天室尋夢園,080聊天室,080苗栗人聊天室,柔情聊天網,小高聊天室,上班族聊天室,080中部人聊天室,中部人聊天室,成人聊天室,成人
Post a Comment